Which action best aligns with addressing a pattern of biased reporting by a colleague?

• A. Publicly reprimand the colleague.
• B. Modify biased language in the report.
• C. Document concerns and report the pattern through proper channels.
• D. Ignore it to avoid conflict.

Answer: (C)

When bias in reporting is suspected, the responsible move is to use formal processes to address it. The best approach is to carefully document each instance—note what was said or written, when it happened, the context, and the impact—so you establish a clear pattern with concrete evidence. Then bring the concern through the proper channels, such as a supervisor, compliance or an ethics office, where it can be reviewed fairly and handled according to policy. This ensures due process, protects you and others from retaliation, and helps maintain accountability and professional standards.

Publicly reprimanding the colleague bypasses due process and can create more conflict; changing the language yourself risks tainting the record and masking the real issue; and ignoring the problem allows biased reporting to continue and harms stakeholders. Following the established escalation path addresses the concern properly and supports a fair, evidence-based resolution.